El_Exodus 1405 Melden Geschrieben 13. Dezember 2013 (bearbeitet) €: wie stumpf^^ http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/3868833927/ Bearbeitet 13. Dezember 2013 von El_Exodus 2
SirGutz 913 Melden Geschrieben 14. Dezember 2013 alles, was nicht komplett aus deutschem stahl hergestellt wird, ist ein plastikspielzeug davon ab, was haben die sich bei der feuerrate von dem ding gedacht? das ist ja lächerlich... So siehts aus alles was nicht über 1200 Schuss hat ist ein muschie spielzeug Dat arme Mg42 würde im grab rotieren, gut bei 1500 Schuss ist das noch mögliche
PrometheusX 367 Melden Geschrieben 14. Dezember 2013 Ein Streit im Internet ist wie die Paralympcis - selbst wenn man gewinnt ist man behindert. 2
Matty 1199 Melden Geschrieben 14. Dezember 2013 Ich kann nicht mehr https://bitbucket.org/FeministSoftwareFoundation/c-plus-equality Constants are not allowed, as the idea of a lack of identity fluidity is problematic. Additionally, if one constant were larger than another, that would privilege the larger one over the smaller one. As such, any numeric value is a variable, and is required to take on at least 2 values over the course of the program, or the interpreter will throw a Trigger Warning. In C+=, you don't write to a file. Dictating to the poor files what sort of information they must store is Patriarchal. Instead, The \<fileIO> library brings in the functions pleaseWrite() and pleaseTellMe(). They both have a chance to return "no", and if so all other calls to the same file are automatically passed over because as we all know, once a file says no to being written, you must always respect that. 1
Angstman 1394 Melden Geschrieben 14. Dezember 2013 Ich kann nicht mehr https://bitbucket.org/FeministSoftwareFoundation/c-plus-equality Constants are not allowed, as the idea of a lack of identity fluidity is problematic. Additionally, if one constant were larger than another, that would privilege the larger one over the smaller one. As such, any numeric value is a variable, and is required to take on at least 2 values over the course of the program, or the interpreter will throw a Trigger Warning. In C+=, you don't write to a file. Dictating to the poor files what sort of information they must store is Patriarchal. Instead, The \<fileIO> library brings in the functions pleaseWrite() and pleaseTellMe(). They both have a chance to return "no", and if so all other calls to the same file are automatically passed over because as we all know, once a file says no to being written, you must always respect that. Der wahe Irsinn ist ja, auch wenn das ein troll ist, ist das aus dem Wahnsinn einer Feministin gewachsen. Also die Idee einer "Feministischen Programmiersprache"
shalashaska 113 Melden Geschrieben 14. Dezember 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOpva_iit-8 frauentausch 'muricah 1
Cpl.Basti 1488 Melden Geschrieben 14. Dezember 2013 (bearbeitet) Ich kann nicht mehr https://bitbucket.org/FeministSoftwareFoundation/c-plus-equality Constants are not allowed, as the idea of a lack of identity fluidity is problematic. Additionally, if one constant were larger than another, that would privilege the larger one over the smaller one. As such, any numeric value is a variable, and is required to take on at least 2 values over the course of the program, or the interpreter will throw a Trigger Warning. In C+=, you don't write to a file. Dictating to the poor files what sort of information they must store is Patriarchal. Instead, The \<fileIO> library brings in the functions pleaseWrite() and pleaseTellMe(). They both have a chance to return "no", and if so all other calls to the same file are automatically passed over because as we all know, once a file says no to being written, you must always respect that. Der wahe Irsinn ist ja, auch wenn das ein troll ist, ist das aus dem Wahnsinn einer Feministin gewachsen. Also die Idee einer "Feministischen Programmiersprache" At no point should the programmer attempt to use indentation to create actual hierarchy in code nesting, as that implies hierarchy in the code. bwahahahahahahahaha Oder auch The use of mathematical operands such as \< and > to denote "greater or less than" are very sexist, and affirm unequal states between objects, logical statements, numbers, and feelings. Bearbeitet 14. Dezember 2013 von Cpl. Basti
